Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Susan Bandecchi vs Nika Radisic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bandecchi vs Radisic analysis and find out who is favored!
Susan Bandecchi vs Nika Radisic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bandecchi 1 - 0 Radisic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bandecchi has won 46.77% of points on his second serve, while Radisic has won 45.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bandecchi, in recent form, has won 57.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radisic has won 52.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.91% and 41.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bandecchi has saved 53.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radisic has saved 45.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bandecchi has won 49.15% of matches played (W/L 29/ 30), with Radisic winning 60.26% (W/L 47/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Radisic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 163/ 122), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/ 24), where as Radisic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.26% of matches (W/L 47/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bandecchi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bandecchi winning 2 and Radisic winning 0. The last match between Bandecchi and Radisic was at the W75 Chiasso, 17-04-2024, First, Clay with Susan Bandecchi getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bandecchi and Radisic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bandecchi winning 0 times and Radisic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bandecchi winning 0, and Radisic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bandecchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 343.22 while Radisic has played against players with an average rank of 276.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bandecchi has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radisic has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bandecchi has converted 46.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radisic has converted 49.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
345
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
378
Rank
375
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
57% (258-192)
Career Total W/L
56% (174-139)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
48% (10-11)
$93,621
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Susan Bandecchi | Nika Radisic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (33/44) | 60% (28/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 43% (12/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (29/47) | 32% (14/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Susan Bandecchi | Nika Radisic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 48% (10/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (25/26) | 49% (23/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (246/224) | 49% (207/217) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 47% (8/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:37 | 1:34:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 390.1 | 233.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1041/1458) | 62% (751/1219) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (620/1041) | 56% (420/751) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (197/417) | 46% (216/468) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (93/191) | 50% (79/157) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (694/1466) | 46% (592/1295) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 48% (10/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (10/20) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (9/0) |
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Lisa Pigato
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
47 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Fiona Ganz
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
73%
(
88 of
120)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
48%
(
58 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Susan Bandecchi
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Panna Udvardy
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Julia Avdeeva
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nika Radisic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Nika Radisic
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
45%
(
29 of
65)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
45 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Jessica Pieri
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Lilli Tagger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Nika Radisic
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bertoldo
Player
Nika Radisic
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Silvia Zappoli
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Tea Nikcevic
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Nika Radisic
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bandecchi Vs Radisic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nika Radisic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
